← Back to Resources

Across the lifespan · participation · adult practice

Sensory Integration with Adults

A practical hub for sensory integration assessment, intervention, co-produced tools, research, learning and participation beyond childhood.

Sensory integration is not only relevant in childhood. Adults rely on sensory information to organise movement, recognise body signals, plan actions, navigate environments, build relationships and participate in the occupations that give life meaning.

Adult sensory integration practice therefore needs to connect neuroscience and clinical reasoning with real life, personal priorities, health, identity, context and the person’s own account of their experience.

Begin with participation. Ask what the person wants or needs to do, what is already helping, where effort increases and what changes may make participation more reachable or sustainable.
PEAR TREE logo, Person, Environment, Activity and Relational Response

Assessment, intervention, research, tools and learning

Move through the pages according to the question you are holding. Each page links professional reasoning with participation, lived experience and the Sensory Project’s developing practice history.

Sensory systems work together to support action and participation

Sensory integration describes how the nervous system receives, organises and uses sensory information from the body and the environment. In adult life this is visible through movement, balance, body awareness, attention, emotional regulation, planning, social participation and the ability to carry out everyday occupations.

Registration and modulation

Noticing sensory information and responding with an intensity that fits the situation, activity and person’s needs.

Discrimination

Understanding the qualities of sensory information, including where it is coming from, how strong it is and what it means.

Postural and ocular control

Using vestibular, proprioceptive and visual information to support balance, stability, gaze and coordinated movement.

Praxis

Imagining, planning, sequencing and adapting unfamiliar or complex actions in response to the demands of the environment.

Adults do not experience sensory systems one at a time. Cooking, driving, working, exercising, communicating and recovering all involve sensory information being integrated with movement, cognition, emotion, relationships and context.

Sensory integration is visible in ordinary occupations

Adult sensory patterns may become clearer through the things a person chooses, avoids, changes, repeats, finds effortful, adapts or uses to recover. They may also change with pain, fatigue, medication, pregnancy, menopause, ageing, neurological change, stress, relationships, housing or life transitions.

Work and study

Open-plan environments, commuting, online meetings, lighting, movement, concentration, deadlines, communication and recovery.

Home and self-care

Cooking, cleaning, washing, dressing, sleep, food, personal space, body signals and shared living.

Relationships

Touch, proximity, conversation, intimacy, trust, social expectations and the ways support is offered or received.

Parenting and caregiving

Interrupted sleep, noise, physical contact, emotional demand, changing routines and balancing another person’s needs with one’s own.

Health and rehabilitation

Pain, fatigue, neurological change, appointments, hospital environments, mobility, body awareness and confidence.

Community and leisure

Travel, shopping, exercise, hobbies, social events, faith, culture, belonging and access to valued places.

Describe first, interpret second

A sensory interpretation should begin with what the person notices, what happens in everyday life and the contexts in which participation becomes easier or harder. One fact may connect with several sensory systems, and patterns may become clearer over time.

Movement at work

Rather than writing “sensory seeking”, record: “Walks around the room during meetings and says movement helps them listen.”

Explore whether movement supports attention, body awareness, regulation, comfort or participation, and what conditions make that support useful.

Touch preference

Rather than writing “tactile defensive”, record: “Says light unexpected touch feels uncomfortable and prefers firm touch when they initiate it.”

Explore predictability, choice, relationship, intensity, timing, context and what the person wants others to know.

Visual complexity

A person dims lights at home, avoids visually crowded shops, prefers open running routes and keeps surfaces visually clear.

These facts may strengthen curiosity about visual complexity, movement within the visual field or visual-spatial demand, but do not establish a diagnosis on their own.

Recovery after participation

An adult appears to manage a busy event but needs the following day in bed or cannot prepare food afterwards.

Consider hidden effort, cumulative sensory and social demand, masking, fatigue, body signals and the cost of participation.

Adult assessment needs more than a checklist

Assessment should connect sensory integration functions with the person’s occupational history, health, roles, environments, relationships, priorities and participation. It may involve self-report, collaborative conversation, observation, functional assessment, standardised measures and specialist sensory integration assessment where indicated.

Begin with the person’s account

Ask what they notice, what matters, what already works, what feels effortful and how they prefer to communicate.

Gather across contexts

Compare home, work, travel, relationships, health settings and valued occupations rather than relying on one environment.

Look for patterns and interactions

Consider how sensory systems work together and how context, activity, health, emotion and relationship shape the response.

Use age-appropriate interpretation

Adult assessment requires adult norms, adult occupations and an understanding of developmental and health-related change.

Keep hypotheses open

Sensory information can guide the next question without being treated as a fixed explanation for behaviour or distress.

Link findings with participation

Ask whether assessment findings help explain access, effort, agency, recovery, safety, belonging or meaningful occupation.

Keep the person, context and relationship together

PEAR TREE™ is one way to organise reflection around adult participation. It does not replace occupational therapy assessment or specialist sensory integration reasoning.

P

Person

What matters to the person? What strengths, preferences, body signals, health factors, identity and previous experiences shape this situation?

E

Environment

What changes across places? Consider sound, light, movement, temperature, smell, visual complexity, crowding, access and opportunities to pause or leave.

A

Activity

What is the person trying to do, and what sensory, motor, cognitive, emotional and social demands are hidden inside that activity?

R

Relational response

How do pace, proximity, tone, expectations, trust, consent and willingness to adjust affect the sensory experience?

T

Triage

What needs attention first, including pain, illness, fatigue, medication, distress, access or immediate environmental mismatch?

R

Relationship

How will support be offered collaboratively, predictably and with genuine choice and the ability to stop?

E

Embodied evaluation

Did the change improve comfort, effort, recovery, agency, belonging or meaningful participation?

E

Ethics

Whose goals are being pursued, and does the support protect dignity, identity, autonomy and the person’s right to decline?

Intervention should support occupation, not impose a sensory recipe

Support may include environmental adaptation, activity modification, collaborative routines, sensory and motor experiences, coaching, education, relationship-based support or specialist Ayres’ Sensory Integration® intervention where this is indicated and within scope.

Start with what already helps

Protect effective routines, environments, movement, recovery, tools and relationships before adding something new.

Make support chosen and contextual

Consider timing, intensity, predictability, meaning, consent and whether the support helps in the activity that matters.

Review the outcome that matters

Evaluate participation, agency, comfort, effort and recovery, not only whether somebody became quieter or appeared compliant.

Sensory language should not replace careful assessment

  • Sensory integration differences cannot be diagnosed from a checklist, preference or isolated observation.
  • Medical review may be needed where pain, illness, neurological change, medication effects or another health concern may contribute.
  • Reflective tools do not replace occupational therapy assessment, functional assessment, standardised measures or specialist sensory integration assessment where indicated.
  • Touch, pressure, movement or restrictive equipment require meaningful consent, risk consideration and a genuine ability to stop.
  • Professional roles, education and scope should be described accurately and transparently.

Learning for different roles and levels of practice

Choose learning that matches your role, intended contribution and current scope. Focused webinars and Seeing Differently support sensory-informed practice. ASI1–ASI3 provide the specialist education route into Ayres’ Sensory Integration® theory, comprehensive assessment and evidence-based intervention across the life span.

Three-part supported course

Seeing Differently

A staged learning journey through sensory integration, participation and wellbeing, combining flexible online learning, practical tools, lived experience, case application and tutor conversation.

Short focused webinars

Sensory “Espresso” Shots

Short bursts of focused CPD for busy therapists and managers, with practical learning around assessment, neuroscience, trauma-informed practice and everyday participation.

On-demand webinar

Interoception, Body Awareness and Self-Regulation

Focused learning about tactile, proprioceptive and interoceptive systems and their contribution to regulation, cognition, communication and participation.

Live lifespan workshop

ASI and Learning Disabilities Across the Lifespan

Research, evidence, neurodiversity and practical skill development with perspectives from families and therapists supporting children and adults.

Specialist lifespan workshop

ASI and Trauma Across the Lifespan

Neuroscience, trauma-informed care, sensory-rich environments and case-based thinking for adults and others whose participation has been shaped by trauma.

Older adult learning

Ayres’ Sensory Integration for Older Adults

Learning beyond childhood that connects neuroscience, trauma-informed care, environments, ageing and participation.

ASI1–ASI3 across the life span

The certificate route builds specialist competence step by step, from theory and neuroscience through comprehensive assessment and evidence-based ASI intervention.

Workshop and webinar learning supports awareness and practice development within role. Specialist assessment, formulation and high-fidelity ASI intervention require the relevant postgraduate professional education, competence and governance.

Adult sensory integration shared through practice and research

These resources include pilot work, audit, dataset analysis, practice frameworks, fidelity adaptation and case-based learning. They can support reflection and service development, but they do not all answer the same questions or carry the same evidential weight.

Porto · practice framework

Data-Driven Co-Production in Adult Sensory Integration

EASI and AASH findings are brought into conversation with Sensory Ladders®, Spiders™ and Grids™ to create client-owned, actionable plans in adult mental health practice.

Porto · pilot study

Adult PRN Percentiles, Protocols and Practice

Preliminary age-banded postrotary nystagmus metrics, symmetry data and a co-produced vestibular self-reflection checklist link measurement with participation.

Porto · local audit

Sensory Needs and Hospital Discharge

An Essex audit considers environmental mismatch, delayed discharge and access to sensory-informed occupational therapy for autistic adults and adults with learning disabilities.

Porto · practice translation

Bridging Sensory-Motor Processing and Human Occupation

Sensory Ladders® connect sensory-motor foundations with co-produced language, priorities and practical support for meaningful occupation.

Porto · fidelity adaptation

ASI Fidelity in High-Security Mental Health

This poster makes safety-led adaptations visible while examining fidelity, agency, therapeutic alliance and trauma-informed ASI in restricted adult settings.

Rio 2023 · clinical audit

Occupational Therapy and Sensory Integration in Adult Mental Health

Historical data and contemporary practice are connected through ASI, data-driven decision making, recovery and occupational participation.

Use posters and handouts to start reflective discussion, then return to the source, authors, methods and context. Conference resources do not replace assessment, professional judgement or formal research appraisal.

A connected adult practice history

Adult sensory integration work within the Sensory Project and ASI Wise history includes NHS practice tools, conference handouts, service development, poster presentation and peer-reviewed publication.

1999

Sensory Levels in Learning Disability

Smith, K. Training pack, Cornwall Partnership NHS Trust.

2001

Sensory Ladders®

Early co-produced work supporting adults to recognise and communicate changing sensory and body states.

2002

Be SMART Profile

Smith, K. and A, H. Cornwall Partnership NHS Trust. Published as a handout and learning tool for national and international teaching.

2006

Sensory Processing Disorder in Mental Health

Brown, S., Shankar, R., Smith, K., Turner, A. and Wyndham-Smith, T. Occupational Therapy News, 14(5), 28–29.

2009

Personalising Sensory Integration Approaches with Adults

Urwin, R. and Smith, K. Poster and presentation bringing together adult mental health and learning disability evidence and practice development.

2009

Borderline Personality Disorder and Sensory Processing Impairment

Brown, S., Shankar, R. and Smith, K. Progress in Neurology and Psychiatry, 13(4), 10–16. DOI 10.1002/pnp.127

2013

Sensory Processing in People with Asperger Syndrome

Shankar, R., Smith, K. and Jalihal, V. Learning Disability Practice, 16(2), with discussion of adult sensory experience and practice.

2021

Older Adults and Sensory Integration

Research update connecting altered sensory processing, executive function and daily activity performance in older adults.

2025

Sensory Ladders® in Adult Mental Health Quality Improvement

A Cygnet quality improvement study highlighted use of Sensory Ladders® within an acute mental health service.

Historical titles and terminology are retained for accurate citation. They should be interpreted in their original context and not automatically treated as current preferred language.

ASI Beyond Childhood Library

Search articles, peer-reviewed publications, conference posters, presentations and milestones relating to sensory integration in adolescence, adulthood and later life.

The library labels different forms of evidence and practice knowledge, helping readers distinguish articles, conference work, publications and historical records before applying ideas elsewhere.

Continue through the Sensory Project shop

Understand the sensory experience within the person’s real life

Begin with the adult’s own priorities. Gather information across occupations and contexts. Keep hypotheses open, recognise what already works and use assessment findings to support agency, wellbeing and meaningful participation.