Practice history
Dated teaching, publications, resources and professional records help establish when and where the work developed.
History and impact
Sensory Ladders® did not begin as a finished behaviour programme. They grew through more than 25 years of occupational therapy, NHS practice, lived experience, family knowledge, teaching, co-production and international exchange.
Beyond childhood
In the late 1990s, sensory integration was still far more likely to be discussed within children’s services. Yet adults in mental health, learning disability and wider NHS services were living sensory lives too. Their bodies, environments, relationships and daily activities continued to shape comfort, communication and participation.
Sensory Ladders grew from the need for a shared language that could hold underalert, overalert, freeze, calm and alert, and sleep across adulthood as well as childhood. The approach was shaped with people, not transferred into adult services as a fixed children’s tool.
Milestones
This is a continuing practice history rather than a claim that one team created every part of sensory work beyond childhood. It shows how this particular project developed and why its current values matter.
Early work in adult mental health began making changes in alertness and body state more visible and discussable.
Adult mental health, DBT learning and co-produced plans shaped a more practical language for state and support.
Live teaching with therapists, families and services helped the work travel beyond its local NHS roots.
Practice development, Medical Futures recognition, OT News publication and peer reviewed writing made the wider approach more visible.
Remote learning with families and rural communities began widening access before online delivery became commonplace.
Free online learning opened the door to individuals, families and teams, including support shared with refugees and displaced people.
The Global Translation Project and international teaching strengthened a community of shared adaptation and exchange.
Arabic, Greek, Zulu and Setswana resources were shared, with further language communities continuing the work.
The project’s sensory, relational, embodied and participation-focused thinking was held more explicitly within a whole-person lens.
Read the history in its published form
These pages trace open access, professional sharing and the work of carrying sensory integration beyond its better known childhood context.
Read the lifelong neuroscience and practice story behind the project.
Read article Open accessFollow the decision to make core Sensory Ladders learning freely available.
Read article Professional sharingSee a published record of the project’s occupational therapy contribution.
Read articleConference sharing
The Porto conference pages preserve the posters, contributor lists and project context in their original published home.
What impact means here
A mention in guidance shows documentary spread. Training feedback shows acceptability. A service account can describe implementation. Outcome evidence asks a further question about what changed. These should never be collapsed into one claim.
How the project documents reach and impact
The purpose is not to collect the largest possible number of mentions. It is to understand what each source can genuinely tell us and where more evidence is needed.
Search public guidance, service documents, research, teaching records, translations and community accounts.
Return to the original source, confirm dates, organisations, wording and the exact resource named.
Separate a mention from recommendation, training, implementation, evaluation and outcome evidence.
Record confidence, limitations and what the source cannot support as well as what it can.
Include lived experience, family and workforce accounts without treating one voice as universal.
Use gaps, corrections and new findings to strengthen resources, teaching and future research.
Four evidence layers
Dated teaching, publications, resources and professional records help establish when and where the work developed.
Public guidance, NHS and local authority resources, international teaching and translation records show where the project has travelled.
Feedback and service accounts can describe usability, shared language and how implementation happened in a particular context.
Stronger evaluation is needed to examine participation, quality of life, service outcomes and possible harms over time.
A public mention is evidence of spread, not proof of effectiveness. Early feedback can guide learning, but it should not be presented as final outcome evidence.
A living learning loop
The project continues through a reciprocal process: people use and adapt a tool, share what fits and what does not, and that learning returns to teaching, translation, resources and research questions.
Carry the history forward
Begin with the free learning, adapt carefully and tell the project what you discover. Shared resources become stronger when people can question them as well as use them.
Please confirm you want to block this member.
You will no longer be able to:
Please note: This action will also remove this member from your connections and send a report to the site admin. Please allow a few minutes for this process to complete.